<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Brother has added you as a friend on Facebook!</title>
	<link>http://blog.ryanashton.org/2007/12/02/big-brother-has-added-you-as-a-friend-on-facebook/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and opinions from Ryan Ashton</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Ashton</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanashton.org/2007/12/02/big-brother-has-added-you-as-a-friend-on-facebook/#comment-11</link>
		<author>Ryan Ashton</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ryanashton.org/2007/12/02/big-brother-has-added-you-as-a-friend-on-facebook/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I actually didn't hear about that particular application, but it is consistent with a clause in their privacy policy:

"We may use information about you that we collect from other sources, including but not limited to newspapers and Internet sources such as blogs, instant messaging services, Facebook Platform developers and other users of Facebook, to supplement your profile. Where such information is used, we generally allow you to specify in your privacy settings that you do not want this to be done or to take other actions that limit the connection of this information to your profile (e.g., removing photo tag links)."

I'm pleased to hear that you agree with my argument.  I like your wording of "opt-in" and "opt-out"--I think that captures the point more concisely than my own wording.  On paper, the presence of privacy controls seems like a sufficient precaution for privacy concerns, but when users have to opt-out of voluntary disclosure instead of opt-in, the reality is that people are reluctant to take the initiative over matters that don't immediately and obviously affect them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually didn&#8217;t hear about that particular application, but it is consistent with a clause in their privacy policy:</p>
<p>&#8220;We may use information about you that we collect from other sources, including but not limited to newspapers and Internet sources such as blogs, instant messaging services, Facebook Platform developers and other users of Facebook, to supplement your profile. Where such information is used, we generally allow you to specify in your privacy settings that you do not want this to be done or to take other actions that limit the connection of this information to your profile (e.g., removing photo tag links).&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pleased to hear that you agree with my argument.  I like your wording of &#8220;opt-in&#8221; and &#8220;opt-out&#8221;&#8211;I think that captures the point more concisely than my own wording.  On paper, the presence of privacy controls seems like a sufficient precaution for privacy concerns, but when users have to opt-out of voluntary disclosure instead of opt-in, the reality is that people are reluctant to take the initiative over matters that don&#8217;t immediately and obviously affect them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n8</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryanashton.org/2007/12/02/big-brother-has-added-you-as-a-friend-on-facebook/#comment-10</link>
		<author>n8</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ryanashton.org/2007/12/02/big-brother-has-added-you-as-a-friend-on-facebook/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I assume you've heard about the sales tracking application facebook has now retracted.  It uploaded information about users' internet purchases onto facebook, offering an 'opt-out' as opposed to 'opt-in' policy, similar in nature to the default 'low' privacy settings mentioned in your article.  Similar, in that both applications assume less privacy as a desired norm.

I agree that the site is a worrying indication of the extent of our collective fascination with self-exhibition, self-promotion, and self-definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you&#8217;ve heard about the sales tracking application facebook has now retracted.  It uploaded information about users&#8217; internet purchases onto facebook, offering an &#8216;opt-out&#8217; as opposed to &#8216;opt-in&#8217; policy, similar in nature to the default &#8216;low&#8217; privacy settings mentioned in your article.  Similar, in that both applications assume less privacy as a desired norm.</p>
<p>I agree that the site is a worrying indication of the extent of our collective fascination with self-exhibition, self-promotion, and self-definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

